Comparative analysis of recognition of prior learning vs traditional entrance to a nursing program
Recognition of prior learning (RPL) is one of several methods to measure the equivalence of access entry criteria into an educational program for mature adults. This study presents the reader with the results of a comparative analysis of the performance of students who accessed a basic nursing program through the process of recognition of prior learning (RPL) and those students who accessed the same program through the traditional routes of entry.
The overall aim was to establish a RPL program that could be implemented to allow students an alternative method of access to nursing programs.
Stuffelbeam's Product evaluation was used to guide this phase of the research project two groups of samples were drawn, one from students who accessed the nursing programme through RPL and the others through the traditional route in each of the three Nursing Education Institutions in Kwa-Zulu Natal. The mean scores of the two groups were compared for significant differences using the Mann-Whitney U test
There were no significant differences in the performances between groups of candidates. Once in the basic nursing programs, the RPL candidates performed as well as the other candidates.
Mature adults who access educational programs via RPL are capable to perform at an equivalent level as those candidates who access educational programs via the traditional route.
Butterworths, C. & Edwards, R. (1993). Assessment of prior learning. Open Learning , 3(1), 234-241.
Clark, D., lrvanistkaya , L. & Goodwin, M. (2000). Vehicle design program survey report: Interviews with recent graduates . Technical Report 2000. Central Michigan University College of extended learning.
Denzin, K. & Lincoln, C. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials . London:Sage.
Freers, S. (1994). An evaluation of adult learners •perception of a community college's assessment of prior learning program. Dissertation abstracts International 56, 00059.
Harris, J. (1999). Recognition of Prior Learning: introducing a conceptual framework. South African Journal of Higher Education , 13(2), 47-52 .
Khanyile, T. (2001). Development and testing of a model for
implementation of RPL. Durban: University of Natal.
Khanyile , T. (2005). The development of the model for recognition of prior learning for nurses in South Africa. Part 1.Development of RPL guidelines by the policy makers and stakeholders of
Polit, D. F. & Hungler, B. P. (1991). Nursing research principles and methods . Philadelphia: Lippincott .
Portier, S.J. & Wagemans, L.J.J.M. (1995). The assessment of prior----nurs--i,n-g.•curationis. 28(4)' 43-51 knowledge profiles: •-A support for independent learning.
Khanyile, T. (2005). Implementation of the RPL guidelines by three Nursing Education Institutions.Curationis, 28(5), 53-59.
Pearson, W. (2000). ..Enhancing adult student persistence . The relationship between prior learning assessment and persistence towards the baccalaureate degree. Experiential Learning, 24(3), 24-26.
Peruniak , G.S. (1993). The promise of experiential learning and challenges to its integrity by prior learning assessment. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education , 19(1), 7- 29. Distance Education. 16 (1), 65-87.
Stuffelbeam, D.L. (1992). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Developm-ent in-Education, 5, 9-25.
Thomas, A. (1998). Prior learning in universities in Ontario. An Aide- Memoire. Toronto:Council of Toronto Universities.
Wolf, G.K. (1996). Prior learning assessment : A case study of acceptance of innovation and change. Sydney
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.